Advertisement
I just pre-ordered your book and I’m really looking forward to reading it. Perhaps you have addressed this there, but I noticed with great interest the emphasis on mestizo ayahuasca shamanism. Having worked with Don Rober and having only experienced mestizo “style” ceremonies myself, I am curious what you might think is different or perhaps advantageous in the mestizo approach as opposed to purely indigenous ayahuasca shamanism in the Upper Amazon? I’ve read about other approaches – some seemingly quite different, like the varieties in Ecuador for instance. Are there elements or approaches in mestizo that are missing or emphasized differently in, say, Shipibo ceremony? Do you think there are advantages or downsides to mestizo approaches vis-à-vis the others?
Truly just curious and wanting to broaden my view of this wonderful work I was privileged to experience.
Truly just curious and wanting to broaden my view of this wonderful work I was privileged to experience.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Steve's book and a question about mestizo
Wed, October 7, 2009 - 6:50 AMThank you for buying the book. I really hope that you enjoy it.
I think that several features distinguish mestizo shamanism, to a greater or lesser degree, from Upper Amazonian indigenous shamanisms. In mestizo shamanism, for example, the role of shaman is combined with that of herbal healer -- roles that are kept distinct in some, but not all, indigenous shamanisms. Mestizo shamans also draw on a large body of popular plant lore regarding the identity, use, and preparation of medicinal plants, while indigenous plant healers -- who, as I said, may or may not also be shamans -- draw on their own and often distinct herbal traditions.
In addition, to a greater degree than indigenous shamanisms, mestizo shamanism has been influenced by both folk Catholicism and by traditional Hispanic medicine -- the doctrine of signatures, for example, and the widespread Hispanic distinction between hot and cold medicines and sicknesses.
Mestizo shamans also appear to share a ceremonial structure that differs from that of indigenous shamans. And mestizo shamans seem -- at least to some degree -- to differ from indigenous shamanisms in the extent to which they have absorbed outside concepts and symbolism, including the images of European biomedicine and -- increasingly today -- the concepts.of ayahuasca tourists regarding the nature, causes, and healing of personal suffering.
At the same time, mestizo shamans are recognizably part of a larger Upper Amazonian religious culture area, characterized by a number of common features -- the use of psychoactive plants; the presence of magical substances kept within the shaman’s body; notions of sickness as caused by the intrusion of pathogenic objects; the ambiguity of shamanic ability to do both good and evil; the central sacrality of tobacco; the acquisition of songs from the spirits; the use of songs for the creation of both medicines and poisons; a focus on healing with the mouth through blowing and sucking; and the importance of singing, whistling, blowing, and rattling in both healing and sorcery.
I hope this answers at least part of your question.
I really appreciate hearing from you.
-- Steve
www.singingtotheplants.com/ -
-
Re: Steve's book and a question about mestizo
Wed, October 7, 2009 - 7:09 PMThanks very much. I'm looking forward to reading your work.
-